|
|
5金币
小作文b2t2
5 Z+ Z7 u* V3 h+ {# {+ |$ JThe bar chat illustrate how amount of leisure time spent by males and females in different employment status between the year from 1989 to 1999.% p, k. C0 R% b H6 z. x. O
Firstly, both unemployed and retailed people spend a majority of time for relaxing and fun in a week. Unemployed and retailed males have 80 hours of leisure in a typical week, while females in same employment status enjoy 70 hours of leisure time. Turning to employed full time males and females, they only spending 50 and 37 hours respectively a week7 M/ `& P1 j0 t
Women who are employed part-time and housewives got similar leisure time in a week time. Employed part-time women have 40 hours as well as those housewives enjoy 50 hours. However, neither employed part-time males nor house bud.
& ?+ \5 n. d* ? AAs conclusion, most people who get a job would spend less time in leisure than people who do not have a job.
0 l/ U; o8 s! D2 i! r2 ~; `- b; R6 t
大作文题目Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside. To extent do you agree or disagree.5 z3 W9 P3 ]. S/ T% E1 C! F" L0 p
5 o2 y4 Q: I4 r/ B. o8 @" C2 o* I
With the acceleration of economy, there are increasingly large companies and factories moving to countryside. But now some people cannot agree on the issue that traffic and housing problems in city centers would be solved if companies and employees moved to rural areas. As for myself, I also disagree on it.% K- j6 w4 r, J# \- j1 M
z- W/ {" [, k& U% V0 J9 b$ P6 F
People who agree on it show an attitude that traffic situation in countryside always more smooth than that in cities. It is convenience for companies to transport their goods because those goods lorry no need to go through cities where always have traffic jam. Besides, factories spend less money to build housing building in suburban areas, as the price of land is undoubtly cheaper than that in cities. Turning to employees, they can live in the companies housing which save their time to go to work. Consequently, people who agree on this issue show a strong view that if traffic and housing problems can be solved, large companies and factories and employees would agree to move in countryside,5 g, ]7 s) G: O2 x: E( }
' ?& u$ Q$ {: ]3 X* w7 g6 SIn terms of that people living in countryside disagree with this issue, saying that there are many serious problems may be cause if moving their companies to rural areas in order to solve traffics and housing problem. Firstly, countryside infrastructure facilities such as transportation and communication systems are poor which may cause less investors. Without a completed road system in suburban, some goods may deliver lately. Secondly, employees who live in factories housing may have large working pressure because there are less entertainment facilities in rural. In this way, they cannot enjoy those fantastic city night lives, which cause unfitness. In a word, both the companies and employees cannot benefit from moving to suburban.7 z2 @5 f. w* P4 X
+ [: P# O* G7 q; l- a* PAccording myself, I also disagree on this issue for following reasons. Although employees who live in company housing in weekday really save time to sleep, this working way may actually arise family problems. For example, children education may be ignored because of parent absent. Parent cannot help them solve difficult homework and children are poorly discipline without supervision. What’s more, it may result in high divorce rate. So I do not approve that moving companies to suburban if we solve traffic and housing problems.( l& q5 o! W* l" g# ]! Q6 a" Z6 M
|
|
QQ好友和群
QQ空间
腾讯微博
腾讯朋友
收藏
转播
分享
淘帖
我顶
我踩
